But what would be the ruling on a peel?
1L: Just because child porn is virtual doesn't mean it's protected by the First Amendment.
Con Law Prof: But children must be used in its production for it to be illegal.
1L: Couldn't the Court consider some virtual child porn to have used a child in the production?
Con Law Prof: I'm not sure I see where you're going with this...
1L: Well, you know how they wire people up and have them move around when they make video games, like Tiger Woods Golf?
Con Law Prof: Oh, I see what you're getting at--kind of like, "here you go, Billy--eat this banana?"
Labels:
law class antics,
professorial wisdom
Blog Archive
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (10)
- February (10)
- January (7)
- December (5)
- November (4)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (4)
- June (4)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (6)
- February (4)
- January (10)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (7)
- August (4)
- July (6)
- June (4)
- May (7)
- April (13)
- March (7)
- February (12)
- January (22)
- December (16)
- November (24)
- October (16)
- September (20)
- August (15)
- July (24)
- June (13)
- May (13)
- April (29)
- March (22)
- February (29)
- January (20)
- December (15)
- November (24)
- October (24)
- September (25)
- August (24)
- July (36)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (7)
- January (4)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (13)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- June (8)
- May (5)
- April (6)
- March (3)
- February (7)
- January (4)
- December (12)
- November (6)
- October (6)
- September (16)
- August (4)